Overview of Loans Against Assets
Before the credit crunch, banking institutions and commercial providers of all descriptions were extremely generous in the level of assistance that they were willing to provide to customers, and so were happy to lend high sums of money to a wider base of applicants.
With the collapse of the economy as a whole, this meant that banks became much more vigilant and cautious about not only how much they were prepared to lend out, but also, to whom they were prepared to provide the loans to.
Ironically, it is precisely this cautious approach that has compounded the worst effects of the recession in that new businesses are unable to get the startup capital that they need which in turn means that many prospective entrepreneurs are simply not even attempting to found a business.
The fact that banks are now actively and routinely requiring borrowers to secure assets as collateral as a perquisite for eligibility to the loan, has also served to stifle the entrepreneurial class.
As a direct consequence of this then, an alternative source of business finance, specifically, loans against assets has grown at an exponential rate with a great deal of success, and so many business owners are indebted to its aid.
Because of the name, as well as the remarkable amount of overlap that exists between a conventional loan and loans against assets, many novices end up confusing the two.
However, loans that are secured against assets are much more flexible by virtue of the fact that they do not need to be secured solely upon fixed assets such as buildings.
It is entirely competent for such loans to be secured over the so called receivables of the company such as purchase orders, invoices and letters of credit.
One of the major benefits of these sorts of loans is that the entire process, from application to the actual receipt of money, is entirely streamlined and designed solely with a view to ensuring that the applicant is able to get access to the funds in the shortest space of time possible.
One drawback associated with these types of loans which must be addressed clearly, is that they also suffer from a fatal Achilles heel: lenders will levy a higher rate of interest than would be typically paid with a conventional, "normal" loan.
However, a counter-argument that could be competently raised in regards to this, is that the increased level of flexibility as well as freedom provided to the borrower, especially when compared against the level of freedom that would be afforded by a normal loan, means that the marginal increase in cost is more than justifiable.
Before you actually make use of loans against assets, make sure that you perform the necessary due diligence and shop around for different service providers.
The reason for this is that the loans against assets is a fiercely competitive market which in turn, will mean that the business owner will be able to secure the most cost effective and affordable deal around with a little work.
With the collapse of the economy as a whole, this meant that banks became much more vigilant and cautious about not only how much they were prepared to lend out, but also, to whom they were prepared to provide the loans to.
Ironically, it is precisely this cautious approach that has compounded the worst effects of the recession in that new businesses are unable to get the startup capital that they need which in turn means that many prospective entrepreneurs are simply not even attempting to found a business.
The fact that banks are now actively and routinely requiring borrowers to secure assets as collateral as a perquisite for eligibility to the loan, has also served to stifle the entrepreneurial class.
As a direct consequence of this then, an alternative source of business finance, specifically, loans against assets has grown at an exponential rate with a great deal of success, and so many business owners are indebted to its aid.
Because of the name, as well as the remarkable amount of overlap that exists between a conventional loan and loans against assets, many novices end up confusing the two.
However, loans that are secured against assets are much more flexible by virtue of the fact that they do not need to be secured solely upon fixed assets such as buildings.
It is entirely competent for such loans to be secured over the so called receivables of the company such as purchase orders, invoices and letters of credit.
One of the major benefits of these sorts of loans is that the entire process, from application to the actual receipt of money, is entirely streamlined and designed solely with a view to ensuring that the applicant is able to get access to the funds in the shortest space of time possible.
One drawback associated with these types of loans which must be addressed clearly, is that they also suffer from a fatal Achilles heel: lenders will levy a higher rate of interest than would be typically paid with a conventional, "normal" loan.
However, a counter-argument that could be competently raised in regards to this, is that the increased level of flexibility as well as freedom provided to the borrower, especially when compared against the level of freedom that would be afforded by a normal loan, means that the marginal increase in cost is more than justifiable.
Before you actually make use of loans against assets, make sure that you perform the necessary due diligence and shop around for different service providers.
The reason for this is that the loans against assets is a fiercely competitive market which in turn, will mean that the business owner will be able to secure the most cost effective and affordable deal around with a little work.
Source...