Cheap Cars Looked At In Context
"Cheap cars" is a relative term.
What is cheap to my neighbour, an Arabian oil prince, may be unaffordable to me.
So, cheap cars need to be put into perspective to make any real sense.
To the average South African household, a cheap car could mean any car substantially less expensive than a new luxury German sedan with a star on its bonnet.
That means the term "cheap car" means an affordable car for the purpose and financial means of the person looking at such car.
Cheap cars could thus be seen as either a second-hand car considerably less expensive than its new derivative, or alternatively a new car of a smallish design without any stars adorning its bonnet.
In the context of Africa, particularly sub Saharan Africa, cheap cars would mean something different to a great many people than it would to their wealthier counter parts elsewhere in the world, who may accept the above definition.
To such people who would mostly be rural dwellers and often be subsistence farmers, a cheap car would mean an affordable vehicle with great reliability and which would run on the smell of an oil rag.
The vehicle would also need to be multi-purpose and drivers friendly.
So, what would these cheap cars look like and would be their purpose? To answer this question one would need to look at the environment the vehicle would be used in as well as the application areas of such a vehicle.
Let's consider a subsistence farmer in the Transkei area, who for a number of years worked on the mines and saved some money to go "farming".
Although he might have a bit of capital to buy seed etc.
and have a few oxen he could in span to plough with, he has no means to transport production goods, nor any transport to sell his produce at any reasonable market.
He further has no means to reach his local clinic 80 kilometres away on a dirt road or visit his kids in Umtata.
This means the man's requirement of a cheap car, might look something like: A sturdy vehicle, with a load area on the roof, preferably a dish like device, able to carry some 300 kilo's.
A great suspension system to cope with the roads, very good brakes, a smallish motor which is easily and economically maintainable, light on petrol, roomy inside and devoid of any luxuries like radios, air-conditioning and leather seats (a real pig may from time to time share the seating, after all).
The car, however, would need to have headlights and windscreen wipers.
The petrol tank would need to be substantial enough to carry enough petrol as the nearest filling station is 80 kilo's away, but he should be able to service the car himself.
Overall the requirement would thus be a simple, strong and easy to run vehicle, not something to brag with at church or the local headman's 'indaba'.
The price? Well, not more than 10 to 15 cows-worth when new...
Well now - how does your expectations of cheap cars stack up with that of our Transkei friend?
What is cheap to my neighbour, an Arabian oil prince, may be unaffordable to me.
So, cheap cars need to be put into perspective to make any real sense.
To the average South African household, a cheap car could mean any car substantially less expensive than a new luxury German sedan with a star on its bonnet.
That means the term "cheap car" means an affordable car for the purpose and financial means of the person looking at such car.
Cheap cars could thus be seen as either a second-hand car considerably less expensive than its new derivative, or alternatively a new car of a smallish design without any stars adorning its bonnet.
In the context of Africa, particularly sub Saharan Africa, cheap cars would mean something different to a great many people than it would to their wealthier counter parts elsewhere in the world, who may accept the above definition.
To such people who would mostly be rural dwellers and often be subsistence farmers, a cheap car would mean an affordable vehicle with great reliability and which would run on the smell of an oil rag.
The vehicle would also need to be multi-purpose and drivers friendly.
So, what would these cheap cars look like and would be their purpose? To answer this question one would need to look at the environment the vehicle would be used in as well as the application areas of such a vehicle.
Let's consider a subsistence farmer in the Transkei area, who for a number of years worked on the mines and saved some money to go "farming".
Although he might have a bit of capital to buy seed etc.
and have a few oxen he could in span to plough with, he has no means to transport production goods, nor any transport to sell his produce at any reasonable market.
He further has no means to reach his local clinic 80 kilometres away on a dirt road or visit his kids in Umtata.
This means the man's requirement of a cheap car, might look something like: A sturdy vehicle, with a load area on the roof, preferably a dish like device, able to carry some 300 kilo's.
A great suspension system to cope with the roads, very good brakes, a smallish motor which is easily and economically maintainable, light on petrol, roomy inside and devoid of any luxuries like radios, air-conditioning and leather seats (a real pig may from time to time share the seating, after all).
The car, however, would need to have headlights and windscreen wipers.
The petrol tank would need to be substantial enough to carry enough petrol as the nearest filling station is 80 kilo's away, but he should be able to service the car himself.
Overall the requirement would thus be a simple, strong and easy to run vehicle, not something to brag with at church or the local headman's 'indaba'.
The price? Well, not more than 10 to 15 cows-worth when new...
Well now - how does your expectations of cheap cars stack up with that of our Transkei friend?
Source...