Should You Fear A Mammogram
The mammogram procedure spreads concern among a lot of women. Concern about a positive diagnosis about breast cancer, makes women want to ignore the medical appointment and move on with their life. But is it truly so?
A mammography can show symptoms of early breast cancer growth, therefore it may assist the patient enter a treatment scheme a long time before the cancer cells can grow and progress to other parts. Nevertheless, not all women see things as it is. Among the first things done wrong in a search for information about the method, is seeking statistics regarding breast cancer. It's correct, these statistics look rather scary, many women with this problem die every year. However the good side of things also need to be looked on, considering the fact that by early detection thanks to a mammography check indicates a rate of survival of 98%. Further studies reveal the fact that the 2% remaining are instances in which the patients die due to problems and other organ failure.
One other thing to be mentioned about the medical procedure is the fact that since it has been intensively used in 1990, the rate of deaths because of breast cancer has substantially fallen by 30% in the U.S. alone.
Apart from statistics and the fear of discovering something out of the ordinary in their breast, some women fear the radiation issue. This fact can also be easily shattered. The quantity of radiation used by a mammogram is drastically less than the amount of radiation used in a bone check, for instance. The bones are thick and thick, thus necessitating a more substantial quantity of radiation. The breast is purely composed from soft tissue; therefore a lesser amount of radiation is used.
People that fear mammography due to radiation should think about the fact that their hand absorbs over 60% of the radiation produced by their mobile phone while carrying a conversation, so why having a mammography needs to be any different?
The device is yet another thing that scares women. A panel will press the breast against another panel, and demonstrate suitable data to a central computer. The pressing is mild and the individual does not sense pain or uncomfortableness. In other case, in which the breast is already distressing, the mammography can produce a slight irritation.
When it comes to results revealed, women fear to hear the bad news, particularly when they are called back for additional inspections. In reality, the mammography doesn't go wrong in detecting something uncommon inside breast, but this is often viewed as a false result. About 7% of women called back for extra investigations are a false positive outcome, and perhaps a higher percentage demonstrate the so called breast limp, that's benign, therefore non cancerous.
The false negative results of a mammography can easily be discovered if the women respect the annual check-up, and return for one more mammography.
After the age of 35 to 60, heading back in the doctor's office every six months is necessary, as this is the period in which breast cancer is more likely to arise.
A periodical mammogram process could very easily uncover what the precedent mammography did not, because of the tumor being too small, or as a result of slow cancer development.
A mammography can show symptoms of early breast cancer growth, therefore it may assist the patient enter a treatment scheme a long time before the cancer cells can grow and progress to other parts. Nevertheless, not all women see things as it is. Among the first things done wrong in a search for information about the method, is seeking statistics regarding breast cancer. It's correct, these statistics look rather scary, many women with this problem die every year. However the good side of things also need to be looked on, considering the fact that by early detection thanks to a mammography check indicates a rate of survival of 98%. Further studies reveal the fact that the 2% remaining are instances in which the patients die due to problems and other organ failure.
One other thing to be mentioned about the medical procedure is the fact that since it has been intensively used in 1990, the rate of deaths because of breast cancer has substantially fallen by 30% in the U.S. alone.
Apart from statistics and the fear of discovering something out of the ordinary in their breast, some women fear the radiation issue. This fact can also be easily shattered. The quantity of radiation used by a mammogram is drastically less than the amount of radiation used in a bone check, for instance. The bones are thick and thick, thus necessitating a more substantial quantity of radiation. The breast is purely composed from soft tissue; therefore a lesser amount of radiation is used.
People that fear mammography due to radiation should think about the fact that their hand absorbs over 60% of the radiation produced by their mobile phone while carrying a conversation, so why having a mammography needs to be any different?
The device is yet another thing that scares women. A panel will press the breast against another panel, and demonstrate suitable data to a central computer. The pressing is mild and the individual does not sense pain or uncomfortableness. In other case, in which the breast is already distressing, the mammography can produce a slight irritation.
When it comes to results revealed, women fear to hear the bad news, particularly when they are called back for additional inspections. In reality, the mammography doesn't go wrong in detecting something uncommon inside breast, but this is often viewed as a false result. About 7% of women called back for extra investigations are a false positive outcome, and perhaps a higher percentage demonstrate the so called breast limp, that's benign, therefore non cancerous.
The false negative results of a mammography can easily be discovered if the women respect the annual check-up, and return for one more mammography.
After the age of 35 to 60, heading back in the doctor's office every six months is necessary, as this is the period in which breast cancer is more likely to arise.
A periodical mammogram process could very easily uncover what the precedent mammography did not, because of the tumor being too small, or as a result of slow cancer development.
Source...