In the end you are responsible for your own vision so if you so choose, lay it down as you wish for your thoughts are a mirror of your mind with varied strokes you can create an image that captures a picture in intricate detail Look to the sky on different days, times and places, to what extent are your perceptions, influenced by your mood For there are myriad ways to experience the moon and the sun, the planets and the stars, sunsets on the horizon, a surging glow at dawn, yet every circumstance has countless elements with infinite arrangements that change with each passing second, to secure them defies even the most rudimentary logic so it may be rational to abandon what might be thought to be real, but then again how might you account for what may have been cast upon your eye, has it been influenced by the light, the condition and the scene Still there must be some degree of consistency in the facets that have been combined to set the immortal stage, infinite variables surfacing and uniting across a shifting core So how then may we begin to separate the impression from the source, the figure, the form, the icon, the picture, the portrait But what is the source, where is it from, how has it been created and with whose eyes shall it be seen, theoretical you say, oh come on, bear with me at least for a moment, an image without perception would seem to be a funny idea, could it exist or is it a contradiction in terms, so it would seem that there must be a solid spot for relativity, Einstein's theory withstanding, but what are the constants and what is the variation and how does it relate, so can't you see what I mean aren't we walking down a slippery slope in homage to the notion of inter-personal subjectivity, for the implications are immense and it may force me to abandon the concept of absolute truth, I just hope there aren't any despots, tyrants or hegemonies around but as this pertains to our ideas about absolutes I suggest that we go over it again, realism may be defunct everything else an impression in varying degrees.
But I say that this is okay because there is everlasting beauty when everything is in flux, perhaps this is what it means to conceive of a god, everything completely above but somehow accessible in infinitesimal conceptions of diversified truth