"GAY MARRIAGE THREATENS THE MENTAL HEALTH OF SOCIETY"
The psychiatrist says Italo Charter the judgment of the Supreme Court: "Certain rights are given to homosexuals. But the ideology present in the judgment eliminates the principle of evidence. The risk is that the will of the fittest is imposed on that of the weak and innocent. To deny the difference between the sexes becomes a crime€
The Court of Cassation has ruled that homosexual couples should have the "right to a uniform treatment to that afforded by law to married couples." But the statement more risky, not reported in the press, is that by which 'has been radically overcome the notion that gender diversity is a prerequisite of being married, as it were natural, the very existence of marriage. "
"This is the most serious aspect of the whole affair -told Italian paper, a renowned psychiatrist, former professor of psychiatry at the University of Milan.€I care and I take care of many gay and I think that if you really want to keep this condition a couple, can receive certain protections. But that marriage is a natural threat is so destructive to the mental violence of the entire society. "
WHAT CAN HAPPEN IF THE LAW, AS DOES THE JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT GOES AGAINST THE NATURAL LAW VIRTUALLY CANCELING?
Chaos happens. If you remove the evidence shared by any man, regardless of the context and tradition comes from, you fall in arbitrariness means that the right of the stronger prevails, those who scream the most. In this case, the promoters of these rights. We are at a historical moment in which the will is so arrogant to want to take over the knowledge of things and so violent: I want to make a family with someone of the same sex, not only ask you not to be discriminated against, but expect to generate with violent and artificial techniques, and then also to raise, an innocent in a context that will definitely not good. If you skip the foundation of law is the law of nature, and recognizes that human reason, justice dies. Neither can we speak of universal rights.
WHAT YOU LOSE THE PERSON AND SOCIETY AS SUCH IF IT BREAKS DOWN THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE BASED ON THE NATURE OF HETEROSEXUAL MARRIED COUPLES?
Generativity and education of healthy persons. Do not you just love to raise children, serve two different personalities from the psychic point of view.
The promoters of gay rights have argued that this condition is natural and that the difference between the sexes is a social construction.
Homosexuals have increased enormously in recent years. Science and experience say that there is no lack of nature in them. There is homosexuality natural, is not included in the DNA. Homosexuality is an elaboration of the emotional psyche of models other than those to which the kind that normally directs. This trend is completely reversible. I have puzzled for years, I read a lot about how you can correct this trend, the problem is that often, while experiencing a hardship; many of them do not want to correct.
IN YOUR OPINION, SHOULD NOT HAVE RIGHTS AS HETEROSEXUAL COUPLES?
Must make a distinction: there are many subjects and promiscuous sex lives unstable. But there are also some of them living as a couple for a long time. I do not mind if the legislature to give them some rights, as is already done, with the ability to succeed in the lease, to receive welfare benefits from family planning clinics, to refuse to testify in trials that involved the partners see etc. But you cannot go beyond this type of concessions, otherwise the mental health of others.
REFERS TO CHILDREN?
Even the stability of the entire society, this decision abolishes the evidence and when it abolishes the principle of natural evidence the mind compensates with psychotic serious imbalances. That is putting in place gender equality as a normal means to attempt the psyche of all. Then I think for the most vulnerable: children. If they are taught from an early age that what they see is not how it looks, they are ruined. Again, although not usually make claims harsh, given that gay people are often severely discriminated against, I cannot say that introduce the idea that sexual difference does not exist, and therefore not relevant, is criminal.
WHAT CONSEQUENCES MAY HAVE TO GIVE THESE COUPLES THE OPPORTUNITY TO EDUCATE THEM?
Nature has made them male and female, and the difference is not only physical but psychological. The human psyche is different from that of the woman: she protects, gives his life for the child shall bear its hardships. The father is the one that severs this bond for the child to grow and walk with his legs. The child was born when the world to grow strong and healthy, to deal with life and problems, needs both of these figures. Without them jumping in the air around the device on which rests the Oedipal always every society. I do not speak their parents' deaths because their presence evoked is still useful in this process. And yet death does not create affective disorders such as replacing a parent with a figure of another sex. We do not know yet the scenarios of a world willing to distort the normal, but they predict dire: the man who obeys his will and not the norm is destroyed. And we must not allow this for the good of all. Man is by nature a being legal to grow it needs to follow the rules given to him as pillars of overwhelming support for walking certain in life.
BUT BECAUSE HOMOSEXUALS ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE RIGHTS THEY ALREADY HAVE AND EAT SO MUCH HATRED AGAINST THOSE WHO FAVORS THE RULES OF NATURE?
Their venom is real. They are angry and frustrated. Often because of the wounds on their back dump the suffering of a point which identify as the cause of it. Even if in fact it is not. So, however, they continue to suffer and make others suffer even requiring them to lie to get what people think will solve life. I work to alleviate their pain is real, but I can not in any way justify the violence destructive ideology that denies the evidence of violent and the weak.
The Court of Cassation has ruled that homosexual couples should have the "right to a uniform treatment to that afforded by law to married couples." But the statement more risky, not reported in the press, is that by which 'has been radically overcome the notion that gender diversity is a prerequisite of being married, as it were natural, the very existence of marriage. "
"This is the most serious aspect of the whole affair -told Italian paper, a renowned psychiatrist, former professor of psychiatry at the University of Milan.€I care and I take care of many gay and I think that if you really want to keep this condition a couple, can receive certain protections. But that marriage is a natural threat is so destructive to the mental violence of the entire society. "
WHAT CAN HAPPEN IF THE LAW, AS DOES THE JUDGMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT GOES AGAINST THE NATURAL LAW VIRTUALLY CANCELING?
Chaos happens. If you remove the evidence shared by any man, regardless of the context and tradition comes from, you fall in arbitrariness means that the right of the stronger prevails, those who scream the most. In this case, the promoters of these rights. We are at a historical moment in which the will is so arrogant to want to take over the knowledge of things and so violent: I want to make a family with someone of the same sex, not only ask you not to be discriminated against, but expect to generate with violent and artificial techniques, and then also to raise, an innocent in a context that will definitely not good. If you skip the foundation of law is the law of nature, and recognizes that human reason, justice dies. Neither can we speak of universal rights.
WHAT YOU LOSE THE PERSON AND SOCIETY AS SUCH IF IT BREAKS DOWN THE INSTITUTION OF MARRIAGE BASED ON THE NATURE OF HETEROSEXUAL MARRIED COUPLES?
Generativity and education of healthy persons. Do not you just love to raise children, serve two different personalities from the psychic point of view.
The promoters of gay rights have argued that this condition is natural and that the difference between the sexes is a social construction.
Homosexuals have increased enormously in recent years. Science and experience say that there is no lack of nature in them. There is homosexuality natural, is not included in the DNA. Homosexuality is an elaboration of the emotional psyche of models other than those to which the kind that normally directs. This trend is completely reversible. I have puzzled for years, I read a lot about how you can correct this trend, the problem is that often, while experiencing a hardship; many of them do not want to correct.
IN YOUR OPINION, SHOULD NOT HAVE RIGHTS AS HETEROSEXUAL COUPLES?
Must make a distinction: there are many subjects and promiscuous sex lives unstable. But there are also some of them living as a couple for a long time. I do not mind if the legislature to give them some rights, as is already done, with the ability to succeed in the lease, to receive welfare benefits from family planning clinics, to refuse to testify in trials that involved the partners see etc. But you cannot go beyond this type of concessions, otherwise the mental health of others.
REFERS TO CHILDREN?
Even the stability of the entire society, this decision abolishes the evidence and when it abolishes the principle of natural evidence the mind compensates with psychotic serious imbalances. That is putting in place gender equality as a normal means to attempt the psyche of all. Then I think for the most vulnerable: children. If they are taught from an early age that what they see is not how it looks, they are ruined. Again, although not usually make claims harsh, given that gay people are often severely discriminated against, I cannot say that introduce the idea that sexual difference does not exist, and therefore not relevant, is criminal.
WHAT CONSEQUENCES MAY HAVE TO GIVE THESE COUPLES THE OPPORTUNITY TO EDUCATE THEM?
Nature has made them male and female, and the difference is not only physical but psychological. The human psyche is different from that of the woman: she protects, gives his life for the child shall bear its hardships. The father is the one that severs this bond for the child to grow and walk with his legs. The child was born when the world to grow strong and healthy, to deal with life and problems, needs both of these figures. Without them jumping in the air around the device on which rests the Oedipal always every society. I do not speak their parents' deaths because their presence evoked is still useful in this process. And yet death does not create affective disorders such as replacing a parent with a figure of another sex. We do not know yet the scenarios of a world willing to distort the normal, but they predict dire: the man who obeys his will and not the norm is destroyed. And we must not allow this for the good of all. Man is by nature a being legal to grow it needs to follow the rules given to him as pillars of overwhelming support for walking certain in life.
BUT BECAUSE HOMOSEXUALS ARE NOT SATISFIED WITH THE RIGHTS THEY ALREADY HAVE AND EAT SO MUCH HATRED AGAINST THOSE WHO FAVORS THE RULES OF NATURE?
Their venom is real. They are angry and frustrated. Often because of the wounds on their back dump the suffering of a point which identify as the cause of it. Even if in fact it is not. So, however, they continue to suffer and make others suffer even requiring them to lie to get what people think will solve life. I work to alleviate their pain is real, but I can not in any way justify the violence destructive ideology that denies the evidence of violent and the weak.
Source...