Did Cash For Clunkers Really Work?
Now that the controversial Cash for Clunkers program is officially over, a lot of people have things to say about the program, whether or not it was a success and if there should be another one or similar programs like this.
Many believe that the US Industrial economy is moving again and that the cash-for-clunkers program was a success that assisted with this.
We see workers are going back work and consumers are now able to buy large and sometimes expensive forms of transportation.
People are borrowing money, loans are being given and money is exchanging hands.
This is what the economy is all about.
So does this mean the program was a winner? Can we now see big improvements due to this revolutionary program? Only a couple of weeks after its end, many people are skeptical.
It's all about the money exchanging hands, or so they say.
But is the money changing the right hands? Is what's good for General Motors and the rest of the US auto industry also what's good for the rest of the United States? Was this program really a benefit to the US economy? It was believed that the government had created value by giving money to car companies and also to dealers.
However, some believe that this may have just shifted that money away from other uses.
Some believe that if the government had not given money to cash-for-clunkers, then this exchanging of money might be taking place in other areas.
Some believe that the bailout and the cash for clunkers program was just another example of the government stepping in the help out big companies that should (and probably do) know better than the make the mistakes they make.
Could a bailout and a program like Cash for Clunkers just be another way of covering up the mistakes they make and allowing them to continue to happen? What the Car Dealers are Saying Most dealers early on agreed with the ideas behind the program.
It seemed like a win-win for everyone involved.
It was also a way to get older, less fuel-efficient vehicles off the roads and replace them with more environmentally friendly alternatives.
While this did require some sacrifices for car dealerships, they were promised their just rewards for taking part in the program.
On the more literal topic of whether or not Cash for Clunkers was a success, statistics have shown that most dealers and car lots are still waiting for the money the government promised them they would have for participating in the program.
Many who participated are not seeing the results they were promised and if asked this very same question, they would probably say it was not a success.
What the People are Saying Many people who are vocal about their opinions on Cash for Clunkers are saying they're not impressed with the results either.
Middle America is reporting that the Cash for Clunkers did very little to help them.
People who couldn't afford to buy cars before still can't afford to buy cars and there is no indication that it's any easier than it was before for them to get a loan.
Families driving around old beat-up cars because they can't afford anything newer and more economical are still driving around those same beat-up cars.
Many people feel the program was a joke, especially since it was pushed from an environmental stand point.
The argument is that while it was pushed as a program that would get fuel inefficient vehicles off the streets and replace them with better fuel efficient versions, it didn't really appear to do that.
Most of the new vehicles that were being purchased were from Japan which did little to stimulate the US economy as well.
Still others who did purchase Toyotas or Hondas that were believed to be more fuel efficient had to do so by obtaining loans that are still very difficult to get.
The cash-for-clunkers program didn't do anything to make it easier for these people to obtain better cars.
There are still millions of Americans who would probably like better cars and if given the choice and they could afford one, would also get a more fuel-efficient vehicle.
However, this particular program did not really help them with that in any way.
People who couldn't afford it before and couldn't get a loan, still can't afford it and still can't get a loan.
Another argument is that all this did for the environment was create a new problem by making the engines of these older vehicles inoperable.
Now someone has to see to it that they are disposed of properly.
As for Stimulating the Economy Many arguments have been made regarding whether or not this really stimulated the economy.
Some people point out that people were brought back to these automotive companies who had previously been let go.
Now the new demand has given these people jobs.
This would appear to be a good thing.
Yet others argue that the boost is artificial and that as soon as the cash-for-clunkers program is over, the steam will run out and these people will just be laid off once again when their services are no longer needed.
In the long run, will this really do anything to stimulate the economy? Many people still consider it to have been an artificial marketplace and many experts will agree.
It was a faux boost based on claims of environmental friendliness that worked out in the favor of neither.
Now in the months that will follow the end of the program, we will see the after-effects and whether or not it really made a difference for positive or negative.
Final Thoughts When you ask whether or not Cash for Clunkers really worked, the answer will all depend on who you ask.
While government officials behind the program consider it a success, many people feel that it was just another government example of value being shifted but not actually created.
While it's true that it may have stimulated car sales and statistics show that there has been an increase in the sale of cars, but many people believe that cash-for-clunkers only increased the interest in people buying cars but has not really made a difference on the number of Americans buying cars or the types of vehicles they are purchasing.
Just because there is an increase in economic activity does not necessarily mean that the program was a success or that the government had the right to stimulate that activity.
Many people are still skeptical about whether or not these types of programs are successful for our economy and whether or not we should see more of them.
Some people also believe that if this did in fact work and contribute to a spike in the sales of vehicles that it could come at the expense of sales later in the year or in the New Year to come.
Only time will tell us if this one is true or not.
With all the speculation about the program and whether or not it would help to stimulate the economy, we have no real answers at this point and it seems it's let to only more speculation.
Time will tell what effect this program has truly had on the US economy.
Many believe that the US Industrial economy is moving again and that the cash-for-clunkers program was a success that assisted with this.
We see workers are going back work and consumers are now able to buy large and sometimes expensive forms of transportation.
People are borrowing money, loans are being given and money is exchanging hands.
This is what the economy is all about.
So does this mean the program was a winner? Can we now see big improvements due to this revolutionary program? Only a couple of weeks after its end, many people are skeptical.
It's all about the money exchanging hands, or so they say.
But is the money changing the right hands? Is what's good for General Motors and the rest of the US auto industry also what's good for the rest of the United States? Was this program really a benefit to the US economy? It was believed that the government had created value by giving money to car companies and also to dealers.
However, some believe that this may have just shifted that money away from other uses.
Some believe that if the government had not given money to cash-for-clunkers, then this exchanging of money might be taking place in other areas.
Some believe that the bailout and the cash for clunkers program was just another example of the government stepping in the help out big companies that should (and probably do) know better than the make the mistakes they make.
Could a bailout and a program like Cash for Clunkers just be another way of covering up the mistakes they make and allowing them to continue to happen? What the Car Dealers are Saying Most dealers early on agreed with the ideas behind the program.
It seemed like a win-win for everyone involved.
It was also a way to get older, less fuel-efficient vehicles off the roads and replace them with more environmentally friendly alternatives.
While this did require some sacrifices for car dealerships, they were promised their just rewards for taking part in the program.
On the more literal topic of whether or not Cash for Clunkers was a success, statistics have shown that most dealers and car lots are still waiting for the money the government promised them they would have for participating in the program.
Many who participated are not seeing the results they were promised and if asked this very same question, they would probably say it was not a success.
What the People are Saying Many people who are vocal about their opinions on Cash for Clunkers are saying they're not impressed with the results either.
Middle America is reporting that the Cash for Clunkers did very little to help them.
People who couldn't afford to buy cars before still can't afford to buy cars and there is no indication that it's any easier than it was before for them to get a loan.
Families driving around old beat-up cars because they can't afford anything newer and more economical are still driving around those same beat-up cars.
Many people feel the program was a joke, especially since it was pushed from an environmental stand point.
The argument is that while it was pushed as a program that would get fuel inefficient vehicles off the streets and replace them with better fuel efficient versions, it didn't really appear to do that.
Most of the new vehicles that were being purchased were from Japan which did little to stimulate the US economy as well.
Still others who did purchase Toyotas or Hondas that were believed to be more fuel efficient had to do so by obtaining loans that are still very difficult to get.
The cash-for-clunkers program didn't do anything to make it easier for these people to obtain better cars.
There are still millions of Americans who would probably like better cars and if given the choice and they could afford one, would also get a more fuel-efficient vehicle.
However, this particular program did not really help them with that in any way.
People who couldn't afford it before and couldn't get a loan, still can't afford it and still can't get a loan.
Another argument is that all this did for the environment was create a new problem by making the engines of these older vehicles inoperable.
Now someone has to see to it that they are disposed of properly.
As for Stimulating the Economy Many arguments have been made regarding whether or not this really stimulated the economy.
Some people point out that people were brought back to these automotive companies who had previously been let go.
Now the new demand has given these people jobs.
This would appear to be a good thing.
Yet others argue that the boost is artificial and that as soon as the cash-for-clunkers program is over, the steam will run out and these people will just be laid off once again when their services are no longer needed.
In the long run, will this really do anything to stimulate the economy? Many people still consider it to have been an artificial marketplace and many experts will agree.
It was a faux boost based on claims of environmental friendliness that worked out in the favor of neither.
Now in the months that will follow the end of the program, we will see the after-effects and whether or not it really made a difference for positive or negative.
Final Thoughts When you ask whether or not Cash for Clunkers really worked, the answer will all depend on who you ask.
While government officials behind the program consider it a success, many people feel that it was just another government example of value being shifted but not actually created.
While it's true that it may have stimulated car sales and statistics show that there has been an increase in the sale of cars, but many people believe that cash-for-clunkers only increased the interest in people buying cars but has not really made a difference on the number of Americans buying cars or the types of vehicles they are purchasing.
Just because there is an increase in economic activity does not necessarily mean that the program was a success or that the government had the right to stimulate that activity.
Many people are still skeptical about whether or not these types of programs are successful for our economy and whether or not we should see more of them.
Some people also believe that if this did in fact work and contribute to a spike in the sales of vehicles that it could come at the expense of sales later in the year or in the New Year to come.
Only time will tell us if this one is true or not.
With all the speculation about the program and whether or not it would help to stimulate the economy, we have no real answers at this point and it seems it's let to only more speculation.
Time will tell what effect this program has truly had on the US economy.
Source...