MEDLINE Abstracts: Health-Related Quality of Life in IBS
MEDLINE Abstracts: Health-Related Quality of Life in IBS
What's new concerning health-related quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)? Find out in this easy-to-navigate collection of recent MEDLINE abstracts compiled by the editors at Medscape Gastroenterology.
Li FX, Patten SB, Hilsden RJ, Sutherland LR
Can J Gastroenterol. 2003;17:259-263
Background: Little is known about the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of nonclinical samples of people with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in Canada. In a pilot survey, the impact of IBS on HRQOL using a population-based, urban sample was examined.
Methods: A random sample of Calgary residents (18 years of age or older), selected by random digit dialing (n=1521), completed a structured questionnaire including ROME II Criteria and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12-Item Health Survey, version 2 (SF-12v2). The mean scale and summary scores of SF-12v2 for those who did and did not meet ROME II criteria and for those who met ROME II criteria with and without visiting a physician in past three months were determined and compared using multiple regression analyses.
Results: Of the 951 households successfully contacted, 590 (62%) were willing to participate, of which 437 (74%) individuals were recruited. One hundred ten IBS cases (81 of which were women) and 327 non-IBS controls (180 of which were women) were identified. All of the eight mean scale scores and the two mean summary scores were significantly lower in people with IBS than in those without, whether or not adjusting for demographics. Forty-four of the 110 IBS cases (40%) sought medical help. Significantly lower mean physical component score and three scale scores (general health, social functioning and role physical) were found in those who sought medical help than in those who did not.
Conclusions: People with IBS experience significant impairment in HRQOL, including both physical and mental well-being. People with IBS who seek medical help report worse physical health than those who do not, but their mental health is no different.
Mearin F, Balboa A, Badia X, et al
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:165-172
Background: Disturbed bowel habit, diarrhoea or constipation is a key manifestation of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In some patients, diarrhoea and constipation alternate, giving rise to the so-called alternating subtype.
Aims: To assess IBS subtype breakdown (constipation (C-IBS), diarrhoea (D-IBS) or alternating (A-IBS)) according to the Rome II criteria and patients' self-assessment, the predominance in the alternating subtype (i.e. constipation, diarrhoea or neither), and the medical and personal impact, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), of the different IBS subtypes.
Subjects And Methods: Two thousand individuals selected randomly to represent the general population were classified as potential IBS subjects (n = 281) or as non-potential IBS subjects (n = 1719) according to a validated questionnaire. Bowel habit classification was determined using the Rome II IBS supportive symptoms.
Results: Among 201 subjects meeting the Rome I criteria, 15% presented with D-IBS, 44% presented with C-IBS, 19% presented with A-IBS, and 22% presented with normal bowel habit. Among the 63 subjects meeting the Rome II criteria, 23% presented with A-IBS. According to the subjects' self-assessment, of those meeting the Rome I criteria, 16% considered themselves to have D-IBS, 66% to have C-IBS and 18% to have A-IBS. In subjects meeting the Rome II criteria, 24% considered themselves to have A-IBS. Among those classified with A-IBS by the Rome II criteria, most considered themselves to be constipated. Regardless of the subtype self-classification, most subjects reported a normal frequency of bowel movements. Clinical manifestations in A-IBS were very similar to those of C-IBS but with the added presence of defecatory urgency. Abdominal discomfort/pain and frequency of visits to physicians were greater in the A-IBS subtype than in the other two IBS subtypes. HRQoL was affected similarly in all IBS subtypes.
Conclusions: Approximately one-quarter of subjects with IBS belong to the A-IBS subtype by the Rome II criteria, although the majority consider themselves to be constipated; indeed, clinical manifestations are more akin to the C-IBS subtype than to the D-IBS subtype. Abdominal discomfort/pain and frequency of visits to physicians are greater in the A-IBS subtype than in the other two IBS subtypes, while HRQoL is impaired similarly.
Bijkerk CJ, de Wit NJ, Muris JW, Jones RH, Knottnerus JA, Hoes AW
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:122-127
Objectives:
Although there is growing interest in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) research, there is as yet no consensus regarding the preferred outcome measure. We aimed to evaluate and to compare the validity and appropriateness of available IBS outcome measures.
Methods:
IBS symptom and IBS health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scales were identified through a literature search. In a panel evaluation, six reviewers independently rated the scales according to predetermined psychometric and methodological validation criteria.
Results:
Five IBS symptom scales and five IBS HRQOL instruments were identified. Two of the symptom scales were rated as good. The Adequate Relief question scored best. This scale demonstrates responsiveness as well as face and construct validity, and its score was considered easy to interpret and appropriate for use. According to the reviewers, the IBS Severity Scoring System performed well with regard to psychometric capacities, but its practical utility was considered debatable. The properties of the other three symptom scales were suboptimal. The practical utility of the five IBS-specific HRQOL scales was considered poor. However, the reviewers agreed that, at present, the IBS Quality of Life measurement (Patrick et al.) is the best choice, because it has been the most extensively validated and shows appropriate psychometric quality.
Conclusions:
The Adequate Relief question is the measure of first choice when assessing global symptomatology as an outcome in IBS studies. For a more detailed IBS symptom assessment, the IBS Severity Scoring System is preferable. Finally, the IBS Quality of Life measurement scale can be used to establish changes in health-related quality of life.
Frank L, Kleinman L, Rentz A, Ciesla G, Kim JJ, Zacker C
Clin Ther. 2002;24:675-689
Background: Despite the rapidly growing body of literature on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). placing the results in a context that is meaningful to clinicians and patients is often overlooked.
Objective: This study sought to quantify the impact of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on HRQoL by comparing the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores of IBS patients with normative US data and with the scores of patients having other chronic gastrointestinal (GI) and non-GI disorders.
Methods: Two IBS reference groups were identified from the published literature: a largely untreated community sample of health maintenance organization (HMO) members (N = 92) and a sample of patients with IBS recruited through clinics and in the community (N = 140). SF-36 scores for these groups were compared with published US population norms (N = 2474) and with published scores for 3 other IBS samples (N = 464); a sample with other chronic GI disorders (dyspepsia [N = 126], gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD] [N = 516]); and samples with other chronic episodic disorders (asthma [N = 375], migraine [N = 303], panic disorder [N = 73], rheumatoid arthritis [N = 693]).
Results: The scores of patients in both IBS reference groups were significantly lower on several SF-36 domains than those of the US normative population (P < 0.003). Scores on several SF-36 scales were also significantly lower in the IBS reference groups compared with the GERD, asthma, and migraine samples (P < 0.003). Depending on the IBS sample used, scores did not differ or were higher compared with those in the sample with dyspepsia. Relative to the samples with panic disorder and rheumatoid arthritis, the IBS groups had significantly higher scores on most SF-36 domains (P < 0.003). Scores for the HMO reference group were generally higher than those for the clinic/community reference group.
Conclusions: Based on the results of this analysis, IBS is associated with impairment of HRQoL relative to US population norms and to populations with GERD, asthma, or migraine. HRQoL appears to be greater in patients with IBS than in those with panic disorder or rheumatoid arthritis, although the relative symptom severity in these samples was not known.
Badia X, Mearin F, Balboa A, et al
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20:749-758
Objectives:
To evaluate the burden of illness in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), in terms of resource utilisation (direct and indirect) and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), in individuals with IBS who meet Rome I and Rome II criteria.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study, carried out by personal interview, on a representative sample (n = 2000) of the Spanish population. Individuals with suspected IBS were identified via a screening question and subsequently given an epidemiological questionnaire to complete. The questionnaire collected information on IBS symptoms, resource utilisation, and HR-QOL [Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36)].
Results:
Sixty-five individuals met Rome II criteria for IBS, while 146 individuals met exclusively Rome I criteria. Of Rome II individuals, 67.7% had consulted some type of healthcare professional in the previous 12 months, compared with only 41.8% of those individuals meeting exclusively Rome I criteria (p vs 17.1%); 'drug consumption' (70.8 vs 45.2%); and 'reduced performance in main activity' (60 vs 27.4%). Compared with the general population, the study sample reported significantly worse HR-QOL scores in four dimensions of the SF-36 ('bodily pain', 'vitality', 'social functioning' and 'role-emotional'. Additionally, individuals meeting Rome II criteria reported worse HR-QOL scores than those individuals meeting exclusively Rome I criteria, especially in the 'bodily pain' and 'general health' dimensions.
Conclusions:
The burden of illness in IBS is important and correlated to the diagnostic criteria employed. Individuals who met Rome II criteria reported a higher level of resource utilisation and worse HR-QOL than individuals meeting exclusively Rome I criteria.
Akehurst RL, Brazier JE, Mathers N, et al
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20:455-462
Objectives:
To identify the impact of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), time off work and the utilisation and cost of health services.
Design:
A case-control study was undertaken matching patients with IBS and controls. Quality-of-life information was collected using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) health survey, EuroQOL instrument (EQ-5D) and IBS Quality-of-Life (IBS-QOL) instruments. Data on time off work was also collected. National Health Service (NHS) resource use in primary and secondary care was estimated by review of general practitioner (GP) and hospital records over a 12-month period.
Setting:
Recruitment was from six GPs' surgeries in the Trent Region of the United Kingdom.
Participants:
161 patients with IBS, as defined by the Rome Criteria I were recruited. These were compared with 213 controls matched for age, sex and social characteristics.
Main Outcome Measures:
SF-36 and EQ-5D scores; mean number of days off work; mean NHS costs per person during the 12-month study period.
Results:
Patients with IBS had considerably lower HR-QOL than controls. They scored worse in all dimensions of the SF-36 and the EQ-5D and they had more time off work. On average patients with IBS cost the NHS 123 UK pounds (95% confidence interval: 35 UK pounds to 221 UK pounds, 1999 values) more per year than individuals in the control group (p = 0.04).
Conclusions:
IBS affects patients through reduced quality of life, more time off work and greater healthcare utilisation than a control group of patients without IBS. The difference in quality of life was pronounced and unusual in that it was influential in every dimension of both the SF-36 and the EQ-5D.
What's new concerning health-related quality of life in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)? Find out in this easy-to-navigate collection of recent MEDLINE abstracts compiled by the editors at Medscape Gastroenterology.
Li FX, Patten SB, Hilsden RJ, Sutherland LR
Can J Gastroenterol. 2003;17:259-263
Background: Little is known about the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of nonclinical samples of people with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in Canada. In a pilot survey, the impact of IBS on HRQOL using a population-based, urban sample was examined.
Methods: A random sample of Calgary residents (18 years of age or older), selected by random digit dialing (n=1521), completed a structured questionnaire including ROME II Criteria and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12-Item Health Survey, version 2 (SF-12v2). The mean scale and summary scores of SF-12v2 for those who did and did not meet ROME II criteria and for those who met ROME II criteria with and without visiting a physician in past three months were determined and compared using multiple regression analyses.
Results: Of the 951 households successfully contacted, 590 (62%) were willing to participate, of which 437 (74%) individuals were recruited. One hundred ten IBS cases (81 of which were women) and 327 non-IBS controls (180 of which were women) were identified. All of the eight mean scale scores and the two mean summary scores were significantly lower in people with IBS than in those without, whether or not adjusting for demographics. Forty-four of the 110 IBS cases (40%) sought medical help. Significantly lower mean physical component score and three scale scores (general health, social functioning and role physical) were found in those who sought medical help than in those who did not.
Conclusions: People with IBS experience significant impairment in HRQOL, including both physical and mental well-being. People with IBS who seek medical help report worse physical health than those who do not, but their mental health is no different.
Mearin F, Balboa A, Badia X, et al
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:165-172
Background: Disturbed bowel habit, diarrhoea or constipation is a key manifestation of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). In some patients, diarrhoea and constipation alternate, giving rise to the so-called alternating subtype.
Aims: To assess IBS subtype breakdown (constipation (C-IBS), diarrhoea (D-IBS) or alternating (A-IBS)) according to the Rome II criteria and patients' self-assessment, the predominance in the alternating subtype (i.e. constipation, diarrhoea or neither), and the medical and personal impact, including health-related quality of life (HRQoL), of the different IBS subtypes.
Subjects And Methods: Two thousand individuals selected randomly to represent the general population were classified as potential IBS subjects (n = 281) or as non-potential IBS subjects (n = 1719) according to a validated questionnaire. Bowel habit classification was determined using the Rome II IBS supportive symptoms.
Results: Among 201 subjects meeting the Rome I criteria, 15% presented with D-IBS, 44% presented with C-IBS, 19% presented with A-IBS, and 22% presented with normal bowel habit. Among the 63 subjects meeting the Rome II criteria, 23% presented with A-IBS. According to the subjects' self-assessment, of those meeting the Rome I criteria, 16% considered themselves to have D-IBS, 66% to have C-IBS and 18% to have A-IBS. In subjects meeting the Rome II criteria, 24% considered themselves to have A-IBS. Among those classified with A-IBS by the Rome II criteria, most considered themselves to be constipated. Regardless of the subtype self-classification, most subjects reported a normal frequency of bowel movements. Clinical manifestations in A-IBS were very similar to those of C-IBS but with the added presence of defecatory urgency. Abdominal discomfort/pain and frequency of visits to physicians were greater in the A-IBS subtype than in the other two IBS subtypes. HRQoL was affected similarly in all IBS subtypes.
Conclusions: Approximately one-quarter of subjects with IBS belong to the A-IBS subtype by the Rome II criteria, although the majority consider themselves to be constipated; indeed, clinical manifestations are more akin to the C-IBS subtype than to the D-IBS subtype. Abdominal discomfort/pain and frequency of visits to physicians are greater in the A-IBS subtype than in the other two IBS subtypes, while HRQoL is impaired similarly.
Bijkerk CJ, de Wit NJ, Muris JW, Jones RH, Knottnerus JA, Hoes AW
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:122-127
Objectives:
Although there is growing interest in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) research, there is as yet no consensus regarding the preferred outcome measure. We aimed to evaluate and to compare the validity and appropriateness of available IBS outcome measures.
Methods:
IBS symptom and IBS health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scales were identified through a literature search. In a panel evaluation, six reviewers independently rated the scales according to predetermined psychometric and methodological validation criteria.
Results:
Five IBS symptom scales and five IBS HRQOL instruments were identified. Two of the symptom scales were rated as good. The Adequate Relief question scored best. This scale demonstrates responsiveness as well as face and construct validity, and its score was considered easy to interpret and appropriate for use. According to the reviewers, the IBS Severity Scoring System performed well with regard to psychometric capacities, but its practical utility was considered debatable. The properties of the other three symptom scales were suboptimal. The practical utility of the five IBS-specific HRQOL scales was considered poor. However, the reviewers agreed that, at present, the IBS Quality of Life measurement (Patrick et al.) is the best choice, because it has been the most extensively validated and shows appropriate psychometric quality.
Conclusions:
The Adequate Relief question is the measure of first choice when assessing global symptomatology as an outcome in IBS studies. For a more detailed IBS symptom assessment, the IBS Severity Scoring System is preferable. Finally, the IBS Quality of Life measurement scale can be used to establish changes in health-related quality of life.
Frank L, Kleinman L, Rentz A, Ciesla G, Kim JJ, Zacker C
Clin Ther. 2002;24:675-689
Background: Despite the rapidly growing body of literature on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). placing the results in a context that is meaningful to clinicians and patients is often overlooked.
Objective: This study sought to quantify the impact of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on HRQoL by comparing the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores of IBS patients with normative US data and with the scores of patients having other chronic gastrointestinal (GI) and non-GI disorders.
Methods: Two IBS reference groups were identified from the published literature: a largely untreated community sample of health maintenance organization (HMO) members (N = 92) and a sample of patients with IBS recruited through clinics and in the community (N = 140). SF-36 scores for these groups were compared with published US population norms (N = 2474) and with published scores for 3 other IBS samples (N = 464); a sample with other chronic GI disorders (dyspepsia [N = 126], gastroesophageal reflux disease [GERD] [N = 516]); and samples with other chronic episodic disorders (asthma [N = 375], migraine [N = 303], panic disorder [N = 73], rheumatoid arthritis [N = 693]).
Results: The scores of patients in both IBS reference groups were significantly lower on several SF-36 domains than those of the US normative population (P < 0.003). Scores on several SF-36 scales were also significantly lower in the IBS reference groups compared with the GERD, asthma, and migraine samples (P < 0.003). Depending on the IBS sample used, scores did not differ or were higher compared with those in the sample with dyspepsia. Relative to the samples with panic disorder and rheumatoid arthritis, the IBS groups had significantly higher scores on most SF-36 domains (P < 0.003). Scores for the HMO reference group were generally higher than those for the clinic/community reference group.
Conclusions: Based on the results of this analysis, IBS is associated with impairment of HRQoL relative to US population norms and to populations with GERD, asthma, or migraine. HRQoL appears to be greater in patients with IBS than in those with panic disorder or rheumatoid arthritis, although the relative symptom severity in these samples was not known.
Badia X, Mearin F, Balboa A, et al
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20:749-758
Objectives:
To evaluate the burden of illness in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), in terms of resource utilisation (direct and indirect) and health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), in individuals with IBS who meet Rome I and Rome II criteria.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study, carried out by personal interview, on a representative sample (n = 2000) of the Spanish population. Individuals with suspected IBS were identified via a screening question and subsequently given an epidemiological questionnaire to complete. The questionnaire collected information on IBS symptoms, resource utilisation, and HR-QOL [Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36)].
Results:
Sixty-five individuals met Rome II criteria for IBS, while 146 individuals met exclusively Rome I criteria. Of Rome II individuals, 67.7% had consulted some type of healthcare professional in the previous 12 months, compared with only 41.8% of those individuals meeting exclusively Rome I criteria (p vs 17.1%); 'drug consumption' (70.8 vs 45.2%); and 'reduced performance in main activity' (60 vs 27.4%). Compared with the general population, the study sample reported significantly worse HR-QOL scores in four dimensions of the SF-36 ('bodily pain', 'vitality', 'social functioning' and 'role-emotional'. Additionally, individuals meeting Rome II criteria reported worse HR-QOL scores than those individuals meeting exclusively Rome I criteria, especially in the 'bodily pain' and 'general health' dimensions.
Conclusions:
The burden of illness in IBS is important and correlated to the diagnostic criteria employed. Individuals who met Rome II criteria reported a higher level of resource utilisation and worse HR-QOL than individuals meeting exclusively Rome I criteria.
Akehurst RL, Brazier JE, Mathers N, et al
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20:455-462
Objectives:
To identify the impact of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL), time off work and the utilisation and cost of health services.
Design:
A case-control study was undertaken matching patients with IBS and controls. Quality-of-life information was collected using the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form (SF-36) health survey, EuroQOL instrument (EQ-5D) and IBS Quality-of-Life (IBS-QOL) instruments. Data on time off work was also collected. National Health Service (NHS) resource use in primary and secondary care was estimated by review of general practitioner (GP) and hospital records over a 12-month period.
Setting:
Recruitment was from six GPs' surgeries in the Trent Region of the United Kingdom.
Participants:
161 patients with IBS, as defined by the Rome Criteria I were recruited. These were compared with 213 controls matched for age, sex and social characteristics.
Main Outcome Measures:
SF-36 and EQ-5D scores; mean number of days off work; mean NHS costs per person during the 12-month study period.
Results:
Patients with IBS had considerably lower HR-QOL than controls. They scored worse in all dimensions of the SF-36 and the EQ-5D and they had more time off work. On average patients with IBS cost the NHS 123 UK pounds (95% confidence interval: 35 UK pounds to 221 UK pounds, 1999 values) more per year than individuals in the control group (p = 0.04).
Conclusions:
IBS affects patients through reduced quality of life, more time off work and greater healthcare utilisation than a control group of patients without IBS. The difference in quality of life was pronounced and unusual in that it was influential in every dimension of both the SF-36 and the EQ-5D.
Source...