Don" t Gamble When It Comes To Voluntary Disclosure Irs
If you are an American taxpayer with an offshore accounts that you thought were secret, you must bring it into compliance that is file missing FBARs and include any missing income on amended tax returns. So what to do? The last offshore voluntary disclosure initiative (OVDI) ended on August 31, 2011. With that in mind, here are the four options currently available to those wondering what to do.
The first option is to do nothing except hope and pray. The advantage is that it costs nothing to do, and there is certainly a possibility, no matter how slight, that the taxpayer can get away with the crime. The downside that is if learned, there is an incredible emotional strain for anybody who become a criminal defendant. Even if acquitted, the entire process will be the most arduous time of someone's life. Even if found not guilty, a criminal trial is still incredibly costly.
This is an important caveat. The chances are that the IRS does not discover hidden accounts gets smaller and smaller. Why? Because in order to compete for US customer and capital, foreign banks are coerced into complying with the IRS. That's right --- foreign banks take their marking orders from the Internal Revenue Service as well. So if the Internal Revenue Service wants information on American holders of foreign accounts, the IRS will get that information. The IRS will also run names of other people it suspects of being US citizens but who opened their accounts with foreign passports. The IRS has incredible investigative powers --- powers it never had before.
The next option is to renounce nationality and depart the country --- as there is no other way to escape the power of the Internal Revenue Service. But be warned --- expatriation only works to dodge upcoming tax debts and compliance troubles. The only method to correctly abandon is to essentially come forward about all offshore foreign bank assets and actually forfeit an expatriation excise (in many ways it was easier to leave Soviet Block country than to leave the USA completely intact with your wealth.)
The third option is to simply file amended returns and not explicitedly tell the IRS that you are seeking to come clean. This is known as a "quiet" or "soft" disclosure. The advantage is that there is little upfront cost to this. But the horrible possibilities are that you may give the IRS a very handy clue to charge you criminally, and if caught, you are see high penalties and a possibility of criminal charges.
The Department of Justice states that it has begun prosecutions on people who have attempted soft disclosures. So this option has some serious problems
There are other problems with "Quiet Disclosures." One massive failing is that they do not address the problem of the taxpayer's non-compliance in FBAR filing; as a willful failure to file an FBAR is a criminal charge. So filing a quiet disclosure 't go far enough to remove any likelihood of criminal investigations. In fact, the 1040X may --- well here's the problem with this option --- it does nothing about the failure to the FBAR. There are still criminal and civil investigations that may be pending for failing to file an FBAR, but simply give the IRS a very handy to locate you.
The forth option is a pre-emptive disclosure and subsequent negotiation of the penalties. If enjoying the rest of your life is chief importance, there can be no doubt that this alternative is the best option. Yes, the 2011 initiative expired, but that does not mean a voluntary disclosure can not be filed. The Internal Revenue Service always welcomes offshore disclosures. The only deadline that was missed was the particular provisions of the 2011 OVDI which capped certain penalties.
There are only two requirements. First, the taxpayer can not be under audit. In addition, the source of the money in the foreign bank accounts can not be from an illegal source. Think drug trafficking or money laundering.
If someone is still questioning what the appropriate course of action is, it is imperative that they only speak to a experienced offshore tax lawyer. The attorney-client privilege only applies in communications to an lawyer. The Internal Revenue Service can subpoena nearly anyone else to give evidence against a taxpayer.
The first option is to do nothing except hope and pray. The advantage is that it costs nothing to do, and there is certainly a possibility, no matter how slight, that the taxpayer can get away with the crime. The downside that is if learned, there is an incredible emotional strain for anybody who become a criminal defendant. Even if acquitted, the entire process will be the most arduous time of someone's life. Even if found not guilty, a criminal trial is still incredibly costly.
This is an important caveat. The chances are that the IRS does not discover hidden accounts gets smaller and smaller. Why? Because in order to compete for US customer and capital, foreign banks are coerced into complying with the IRS. That's right --- foreign banks take their marking orders from the Internal Revenue Service as well. So if the Internal Revenue Service wants information on American holders of foreign accounts, the IRS will get that information. The IRS will also run names of other people it suspects of being US citizens but who opened their accounts with foreign passports. The IRS has incredible investigative powers --- powers it never had before.
The next option is to renounce nationality and depart the country --- as there is no other way to escape the power of the Internal Revenue Service. But be warned --- expatriation only works to dodge upcoming tax debts and compliance troubles. The only method to correctly abandon is to essentially come forward about all offshore foreign bank assets and actually forfeit an expatriation excise (in many ways it was easier to leave Soviet Block country than to leave the USA completely intact with your wealth.)
The third option is to simply file amended returns and not explicitedly tell the IRS that you are seeking to come clean. This is known as a "quiet" or "soft" disclosure. The advantage is that there is little upfront cost to this. But the horrible possibilities are that you may give the IRS a very handy clue to charge you criminally, and if caught, you are see high penalties and a possibility of criminal charges.
The Department of Justice states that it has begun prosecutions on people who have attempted soft disclosures. So this option has some serious problems
There are other problems with "Quiet Disclosures." One massive failing is that they do not address the problem of the taxpayer's non-compliance in FBAR filing; as a willful failure to file an FBAR is a criminal charge. So filing a quiet disclosure 't go far enough to remove any likelihood of criminal investigations. In fact, the 1040X may --- well here's the problem with this option --- it does nothing about the failure to the FBAR. There are still criminal and civil investigations that may be pending for failing to file an FBAR, but simply give the IRS a very handy to locate you.
The forth option is a pre-emptive disclosure and subsequent negotiation of the penalties. If enjoying the rest of your life is chief importance, there can be no doubt that this alternative is the best option. Yes, the 2011 initiative expired, but that does not mean a voluntary disclosure can not be filed. The Internal Revenue Service always welcomes offshore disclosures. The only deadline that was missed was the particular provisions of the 2011 OVDI which capped certain penalties.
There are only two requirements. First, the taxpayer can not be under audit. In addition, the source of the money in the foreign bank accounts can not be from an illegal source. Think drug trafficking or money laundering.
If someone is still questioning what the appropriate course of action is, it is imperative that they only speak to a experienced offshore tax lawyer. The attorney-client privilege only applies in communications to an lawyer. The Internal Revenue Service can subpoena nearly anyone else to give evidence against a taxpayer.
Source...