The fundamental difference between Capitalism and Marketism is the approach toward personal liability of business structures: in case corporate structures; unless the Capitalistic corporate risk management's very limited liability the Market corporate risk management personal liability is very enhance and is in the foundations of the Economics of Marketism.
To limit the existing business specula and market insecurity business laws of Corporate risk management personal liability must prevent "shady" business practices and promote personal responsibility.
Lately, many medium size US Corporations are reducing ownership of physical assets such as infrastructure and even production machinery by selling these assets and leasing them back, they are also outsourcing manufacturing and going international: these new corporations are mostly becoming Intellectual property holders by mostly maintaining risk management and sales, therefore the accent in order to protect these corporations from long and expensive court time goes to: Intellectual property laws to be enhanced, improved and so clearly stated thus shell be no difference between physical property laws and the intellectual property laws in the way they are applied by courts, therefore they the intellectual property laws have to be criminalized much farther these currently are Business laws to be enhanced, improved and so clearly stated to become more like criminal code: thus providing medium to small businesses and individual investors with the powers to contest big businesses and big investors in court without spending a fortune: contract laws should be mandatory and carryon personal liability of the corporate management A consistent pressure should be applied to all countries participating in the Globalizing market to accept the same business rules and laws.
These actions will give to the medium to mall businesses and investors much more power to fight for their interests and the needed security to access financing, and consequently to expand their business.
At the same time to protect markets from fraudulent activities and speculations their structures: Should be "bonded" when they do business thus because of the extensive bonding underwriting fraudulent business will be limited Their risk management should be liable for their fraudulent activities under criminalized business law Business related fraudulent promotions, advertising, court statements should equally penalized.
The same rules should apply equally to all participating countries and markets.
Consequently, when such business and corporate laws are implemented the "limited liability" under current laws obviously will not exist therefore corporate risk management will have full liability under these new business laws and such personal for these liability will expand from internally for US to Globally for the entire World Market.
This approach is needed for: First, to provide a better business environment for all corporate participants independently of size, nationality or sphere of activities: thus to enhance their ability for being financed by improving their security.
Second, to provide a better protection to the consumers and markets from fraudulent activities.
Third, to allow a smooth Global expansion to many pore participants Fourth, to raise profitability by this expansion and therefore allow Medium to Small Investors to generate return on their investment and thus add a new sector to the farming, manufacturing and service current sectors for generation of income that will allow expansion to the Monetary and Fiscal supplies.
Fifth, and may be the most important, it will allow better control over the Environmental protection.