The Concorde Conspiracy Theory Continues But History Rapidly Forgets - He Said
Last year I was talking with a fellow aviation history buff.
He is still convinced that the crash of the Concorde was not what the investigators had proclaimed.
Sure, anytime there is a crash of this magnitude folks will want answers and it's hard to be satisfied with bureaucratic explanations.
We saw this after the JFK assassination decades the prior and people still talk about it today.
Perhaps, we will never know the truth, or perhaps there is a remote chance that what we've all been told is the straight skinny - still, most of us aren't buying it.
Okay so, let's talk about plausible deniability, conspiracy theory, and potential other explanations of the Concorde crash shall we? My acquaintance suggested that I take a good hard look at some of the photos still available, and then he asked if I had been seen the picture where the bottom of the wing picked up a piece of the tire which get shredded when it hit the Continental debris on the runway? He explained that he once saw a head on picture, but that someone had been removing all the duplicates of that digital picture from the Internet? But who would do that? Ah, so this is how conspiracy theories get started, is it? Probably, but still it makes you think; I mean what if he's right? If so we've all been fed a line of goods, and that's unfortunate as it sets back supersonic transportation a couple of more decades.
Interestingly enough at the 2012 NBAA (National Business Aviation Association) conference, Gulfstream unveiled its plans to move forward on a supersonic business jet.
Good for them, as it's been a while since the SST, XB-70, Tu-144, and the Concorde, and remember those are all 1970s designs, think how much more we know today? Lots, in fact, NASA and several top notched aerospace universities have been working on sound cloaking technologies, much of which has been declassified transfer technology - meaning now we can silence the sonic boom - which paves the way for a supersonic business corporate jet you see? Nevertheless, my acquaintance is still in search of that elusive digital photo of a head-on shot of the flame coming from under the aft section of the Concorde wing on that fateful day.
This a conspiracy theory he was proposing, might actually have some merit, if what he's saying is correct.
That is to say that; something else that may have happened instead of what that accident report claims; debris from the previous aircraft which took off, a Continental heavy.
That debris shredded the tires and the tires came apart and ripped into the bottom of the wing where the fuel was.
Now that I think about it, I remember seeing that picture it was taken head-on slightly off-center, but I can't find it anywhere - well, this is how conspiracy theories go, but flying is still the safest way to travel and the faster you go, the better for me.
Please consider all this and think on it.
He is still convinced that the crash of the Concorde was not what the investigators had proclaimed.
Sure, anytime there is a crash of this magnitude folks will want answers and it's hard to be satisfied with bureaucratic explanations.
We saw this after the JFK assassination decades the prior and people still talk about it today.
Perhaps, we will never know the truth, or perhaps there is a remote chance that what we've all been told is the straight skinny - still, most of us aren't buying it.
Okay so, let's talk about plausible deniability, conspiracy theory, and potential other explanations of the Concorde crash shall we? My acquaintance suggested that I take a good hard look at some of the photos still available, and then he asked if I had been seen the picture where the bottom of the wing picked up a piece of the tire which get shredded when it hit the Continental debris on the runway? He explained that he once saw a head on picture, but that someone had been removing all the duplicates of that digital picture from the Internet? But who would do that? Ah, so this is how conspiracy theories get started, is it? Probably, but still it makes you think; I mean what if he's right? If so we've all been fed a line of goods, and that's unfortunate as it sets back supersonic transportation a couple of more decades.
Interestingly enough at the 2012 NBAA (National Business Aviation Association) conference, Gulfstream unveiled its plans to move forward on a supersonic business jet.
Good for them, as it's been a while since the SST, XB-70, Tu-144, and the Concorde, and remember those are all 1970s designs, think how much more we know today? Lots, in fact, NASA and several top notched aerospace universities have been working on sound cloaking technologies, much of which has been declassified transfer technology - meaning now we can silence the sonic boom - which paves the way for a supersonic business corporate jet you see? Nevertheless, my acquaintance is still in search of that elusive digital photo of a head-on shot of the flame coming from under the aft section of the Concorde wing on that fateful day.
This a conspiracy theory he was proposing, might actually have some merit, if what he's saying is correct.
That is to say that; something else that may have happened instead of what that accident report claims; debris from the previous aircraft which took off, a Continental heavy.
That debris shredded the tires and the tires came apart and ripped into the bottom of the wing where the fuel was.
Now that I think about it, I remember seeing that picture it was taken head-on slightly off-center, but I can't find it anywhere - well, this is how conspiracy theories go, but flying is still the safest way to travel and the faster you go, the better for me.
Please consider all this and think on it.
Source...