Issue Tracking: Public Clouds Versus Private Clouds
Companies that implement a cloud issue tracking program implement the application using one of two types of clouds: a private model that is maintained onsite, or a public model that a web-based service provider maintains.
Each model has unique advantages that a company should carefully consider before it decides which one to implement.
Below is a brief summation of how the models compare to each other in terms of cost, security, and overall usability.
Cost Implementing issue tracking software in house involves more expense than receiving it online.
Licensing fees, installation costs, and system maintenance fees are an inevitable part of implementing an application onsite.
These costs are avoided when the web-based model is used.
The customer pays an affordable, monthly fee that is based on system options and user level.
For startups that need to preserve capital and companies the need more flexibility in the IT budget, using an online program is the best option.
Security Data for in house issue tracking software can be more tightly controlled than data for a web-based program.
However, more control doesn't necessarily result in better security.
Because protecting the data of customers is central to the services that a web-based service provider offers, companies can depend on their data to be protected as well as it would be in house.
To prove the point, no statistics exist for data that has been stolen or repurposed after it was transmitted to a provider of web-based IT applications.
Usability Applications that serve several users must often be accessible remotely - a feature that both in house and web-based virtualized programs offer.
Another key feature of usability is how well the resource can be configured to meet the customer's needs.
Closed source, proprietary systems typically offer more configurability than open source systems, and are thus preferable for customers that have unique needs.
Applications that are easily accessible and configurable are highly usable.
Conclusion Cloud issue tracking software can be implemented on a private model or a pubic model.
When a company is without policies that prevent the transfer of information to third parties, it often chooses the latter in order to save money.
In terms of usability, both models are remotely accessible, and can can be easily tailored to the user's needs when they are proprietary solutions.
For assistance choosing the right model of implementation for your business, contact a provider of issue tracking software today.
Each model has unique advantages that a company should carefully consider before it decides which one to implement.
Below is a brief summation of how the models compare to each other in terms of cost, security, and overall usability.
Cost Implementing issue tracking software in house involves more expense than receiving it online.
Licensing fees, installation costs, and system maintenance fees are an inevitable part of implementing an application onsite.
These costs are avoided when the web-based model is used.
The customer pays an affordable, monthly fee that is based on system options and user level.
For startups that need to preserve capital and companies the need more flexibility in the IT budget, using an online program is the best option.
Security Data for in house issue tracking software can be more tightly controlled than data for a web-based program.
However, more control doesn't necessarily result in better security.
Because protecting the data of customers is central to the services that a web-based service provider offers, companies can depend on their data to be protected as well as it would be in house.
To prove the point, no statistics exist for data that has been stolen or repurposed after it was transmitted to a provider of web-based IT applications.
Usability Applications that serve several users must often be accessible remotely - a feature that both in house and web-based virtualized programs offer.
Another key feature of usability is how well the resource can be configured to meet the customer's needs.
Closed source, proprietary systems typically offer more configurability than open source systems, and are thus preferable for customers that have unique needs.
Applications that are easily accessible and configurable are highly usable.
Conclusion Cloud issue tracking software can be implemented on a private model or a pubic model.
When a company is without policies that prevent the transfer of information to third parties, it often chooses the latter in order to save money.
In terms of usability, both models are remotely accessible, and can can be easily tailored to the user's needs when they are proprietary solutions.
For assistance choosing the right model of implementation for your business, contact a provider of issue tracking software today.
Source...